https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82103
--- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann <arnd at linaro dot org> --- In that case, shouldn't we also warn if the conditional function call in front of it wasn't there, or without the '__n != 0' check?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82103
--- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann <arnd at linaro dot org> --- In that case, shouldn't we also warn if the conditional function call in front of it wasn't there, or without the '__n != 0' check?