https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com> --- The Comment 5 binaries SEGV and do not start on Fedora 26 armv7l. But I do not see some wrong DWARF there. (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #3) > Addresses are missing when the function is inlined. > But these testfiles do not use -O optimization so I find wrong if GCC has > inlined anything. I was sure wrong here, in this case the address is not displayed when it matches the first instruction of a source line. It could be rather bugreported to GDB how to make it reproducible (I haven't built GCC trunk on that Fedora 26 armv7l, though).
