https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41455
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I suspect what we can do is "lower" assignments to memcpy in a pass right before tail call to optimize this case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41455
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I suspect what we can do is "lower" assignments to memcpy in a pass right before tail call to optimize this case.