https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> (insn 66 37 38 2 (set (reg:SI 0 ax [159])
> (reg:SI 3 bx [159])) "pr82545.c":27 82 {*movsi_internal}
> (nil))
> (insn 38 66 39 2 (parallel [
> (set (zero_extract:SI (reg:SI 0 ax [159])
> (const_int 8 [0x8])
> (const_int 8 [0x8]))
> (subreg:SI (plus:QI (subreg:QI (zero_extract:SI (reg:SI 0 ax
> [159])
> (const_int 8 [0x8])
> (const_int 8 [0x8])) 0)
> (subreg:QI (zero_extract:SI (reg:SI 1 dx [163])
> (const_int 8 [0x8])
> (const_int 8 [0x8])) 0)) 0))
> (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
> ]) "pr82545.c":27 235 {*addqi_ext_2}
> (nil))
Do we need "+Q" instead of "=Q" on LHS zero_extract patterns?
