https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[basic.scope.class] p2:
"A name N used in a class S shall refer to the same declaration in its context
and when re-evaluated in the completed scope of S. No diagnostic is required
for a violation of this rule."
So the code is ill-formed, no diagnostic required.
GCC is allowed to reject it. The other compilers fail to diagnose it (which is
also conforming).
