https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814 > > Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot > gnu.org > > --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Nope, nothing breaks. It occurred to me that we might get rid of it when I > found out that the code comes from rms, 1992. :) I'm all for it - maybe you can do one further verification step in instrumenting the number of cases it triggers during bootstrap? Might be a bit awkward to only detect the cases where an actual transform happens ...
