https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > The TREE_INT_CST_LOW part looks suspicious. Also, wide-int.h should provide > enough infrastructure so that you should be able to do everything on > wide-int, not have to create trees. I just saw this comment now. I think that the TREE_INT_CST_LOW is ok given that we've already constrained bump to fit in a HOST_WIDE_INT, right? But anyway, your second point is well taken -- it looks like I can make use of wi::to_uhwi and wi::to_shwi with a specified precision from the target type, so use of trees should indeed be unnecessary. I have a working patch that uses the trees, but I will rework that in favor of a pure wide-int solution. Thanks for the suggestion! Bill
