https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to c...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #8)
> Subject: Re: Broken gcc mailing list archives
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:30:21AM -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
> wrote:
> >
> >--
> >
> >pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
> >
> > What |Removed |Added
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Last reconfirmed|2005-09-07 16:53:59 |2005-12-10 05:30:21
> > date| |
> >
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
> >
> >------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> >You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>
> Given the age of these bugs should we just close them as "wontfix"? I don't
> see anyone stepping up to fix them anytime soon.
>
> cgf
OK, doing that.
