https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434
Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
To more accurately schedule fusion pairs wouldn't we need to specify the
scheduling behaviour of the group as well? From the dumps below it schedules
the adrp/add in the same cycle if we're lucky, but it is modelled as using 2
ALUs rather than a new single fused instruction.
Also is your change fixing the issue that the scheduler cannot schedule 2
instructions with a zero latency dependency between them in the same cycle?
That's a very similar bug.
