https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362
--- Comment #6 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Created attachment 41715 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41715&action=edit Tentative patch Removed the npeel function argument, also removed body_cost_vec and the corresponding release ()es. I'm not so sure about the semantics of vecs in general. Are we leaking memory when not releasing the body_cost_vecs contained in the various _vect_peel_extended_infos? If it was RAII-like body_cost_vec there would have been no need to release () body_cost_vec before, so I assume it is not.
