https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #18) > This seems like a useful enhancement. H.J., what is the status of the > patch? Do you have plans to submit it? I was not sure if there were enough interests. I need to rebase my code to see if it still applies. > On a related note, would warning on the use of a type explicitly decorated > with a restrictive alignment attribute in an unaligned context achieve the > same thing as the new attribute without false positives? (That way existing > code would automatically benefit from the new warning, without having to add > a new attribute.) A testcase?
