https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80507
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2017-04-24 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I thought the original in-class declaration needed to be constexpr, but actually that would be invalid if it didn't have an in-class initializer.