https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69853
Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> --- It seems to me that the current semantics of inherited constructors cause the base constructor that would take a tuple to not be inherited. clang+libc++ agree. I think this is thus invalid.