https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69853

Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> ---
It seems to me that the current semantics of inherited constructors cause the
base constructor that would take a tuple to not be inherited. clang+libc++
agree. I think this is thus invalid.

Reply via email to