https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881

Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #22 from Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #15)
> The new testcase FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/SPARC:

+ AArch64


> 
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03   -O0  execution test
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03   -O1  execution test
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03   -O2  execution test
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
> -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03   -O3 -g  execution test
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03   -Os  execution test
> 
> Thread 2 received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> [Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
> 0xffffffff7f0e6920 in __lwp_sigqueue () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
> (gdb) where
> #0  0xffffffff7f0e6920 in __lwp_sigqueue () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
> #1  0xffffffff7f02949c in raise () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
> #2  0xffffffff7eff8174 in abort () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
> #3  0xffffffff2d039dc4 in _gfortrani_sys_abort ()
>     at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgfortran/runtime/error.c:180
> #4  0xffffffff2d11840c in _gfortran_abort ()
>     at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgfortran/intrinsics/abort.c:32
> #5  0x000000010000236c in p ()
>     at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03:64
> #6  0x00000001000024d8 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffffffff7ffff84c)
>     at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03:46
> #7  0x00000001000014ac in _start ()
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> 
> #5  0x000000010000236c in p ()
>     at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_26.f03:64
> 64        if (imsg.ne."End of record") call abort
> (gdb) p imsg
> $1 = ' ' <repeats 256 times>
> 
>   Rainer

Reply via email to