https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #49 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
While I think that adding explicit copy/assignment constructors
as in comment #43 should work and looks like the most portable
solution for boost, I am unsure if may_alias shouldn't really
work different.
I thought of another use of may_alias that also applies to C:
Isn't the plan to add may_alias to the struct sockaddr_storage ?
And wouldn't you then expect to add a sockaddr_storage
to a structure like:
struct A
{
struct sockaddr_storage s;
};
does'nt that mean that
A a, b;
a.s = b.s;
will also ignore the may_alias ?
