https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #7 from Walt Brainerd <walt.brainerd at gmail dot com> --- With GENERIC and PUBLIC statements ifort says "No visible interface" gfortran gets an ICE So I assume the code is wrong, as you suggest, but both give funny messages With the other "bug" I filed: program g_bug2: With an interface block and PUBLIC gfortran gives a strange message about "Module nature" on the USE statement ifort works correctly. I hope this helps; let me know if I can do anything else. On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:01 AM, paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 > > --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com > <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- > Hi Walt, > > My reading of the situation is that since, in this version, the > generic procedure is typebound in a public derived type, the PUBLIC > attribute is already accorded it..... I think! > > Do you have access to a recent copy of ifort? Mine is on my > workstation, which is still in storage after a house move. I would be > curious to know how it responds to both the typebound and the explicit > generic interface versions. > > Best regards > > Paul > > On 6 February 2017 at 17:50, walt.brainerd at gmail dot com > <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 > > > > --- Comment #4 from Walt Brainerd <walt.brainerd at gmail dot com> --- > > Sorry, I forgot to remove the extraneous USE statement > > which cutting down from the original code. > > > > I am not good with this new stuff; please explain what > > the syntax error is? If the PUBLIC statement is not correct, > > how do you make the write(formatted) interface public? > > > > Thanks for looking at this so quickly. > > > > -- > > You are receiving this mail because: > > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
