https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at acm dot org> --- On 12/05/2016 03:44 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I thought that such constructs are widely used though, I believe e.g. glibc > used arrays of structs with flexible array members in several places. Maybe > it > has changed, I've lost track. So, before changing anything like that we'd > need > to make sure e.g. glibc still builds. Remarkable. I wonder what meaning such code is expected to have. Anyway, I've noted on bug 68489. I guess we want both C & C++ modes to agree whether such array types are meaningful. nathan
