https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Maybe llvm doesn't care about backwards compatibility, but we do. Sure, are we going to make a behavior change (and document it) in upcoming release? If so, I can prepare a patch including the documentation change.
