https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
--- Comment #17 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #15) > FYI: You could merge the two alternatives into one. > > =?r,?&r > 0, r > i, i > > is equivalent to > > =?&r > 0r > i Yes, that seems possible. These patterns will need to be changed significantly to fix PR 77308, so this can be done as part of that work.
