https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- That's what library version numbering was made, wasn't it? I.e., this is the way to go IMO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- That's what library version numbering was made, wasn't it? I.e., this is the way to go IMO.