https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77669
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |lto
Target| |arm
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2016-09-21
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unless you can provide a complete testcase that compiles to sth executable it's
not possible to help you in debugging this.
LTO may cause static variable constructors to run in a different order than
when not using LTO (but they still behave according to the language rules
which basically make ordering unspecififed AFAIR).
