https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #17) > Vlad, the patch checks out very well on powerpc64le. 403.gcc no longer > degrades. We are seeing some very nice improvements from LRA over reload on > a few benchmarks (435.gromacs leads the way with +9.5%). Everything in > CPU2006 is positive or noise except for 401.bzip2, which shows about a 2% > degradation. We'll look into that separately to see if it's real and open > another bug if there is anything to report. > > Once the patch is in place, I think we will be ready to switch the POWER > server targets to use LRA by default. > > Thanks! Excellent results. Mike, Bill, thank you for benchmarking the patch. I've just submitted the patch into the trunk. As the patch affects a complicated inheritance code in LRA, there is a possibility of new regressions on some targets. So if this happens, another iteration on the patch might be done.
