https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #10) > No opinion on the "x" prefix. I think that was already in place when that > code was updated to support qsetjmp and savectx in the early 90s. I've > never seen the "x" versions in practice. > I would like to get rid of the 25 year old ballast, that is likely good for nothing. > ANd yes, you're raising real issues (you can find instances in the real > world where this has bitten folks). > > Unfortunately, I don't know a signature for savectx. I haven't used a > solaris system in eons. Maybe it would be a better option to add the returns_twice it to the fixinclude machinery?
