https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564 > > Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > It looks like both the pragma and the attribute accept any kind of -f/-O > > options > > regardless of them being marked as 'Optimization' in the .opt file. They > > get applied via decode_options and thus may have side-effects not reflected > > by > > cl_optimization_save/restore. > > > > I have a patch to issue > > > > /tmp/t.c:2:9: warning: bad option -fno-lto to pragma attribute [-Wpragmas] > > #pragma GCC optimize ("-fno-lto") > > ^~~ > > to pragma attribute? > > Do you mean "to pragma 'optimize'"? > > This would be even prettier: > > ret = false; > warning (attr_p ? OPT_Wattributes : OPT_Wpragmas, > attr_p ? "bad option %qs to attribute %<optimize%>" > : "bad option %qs to pragma %<optimize>%", > decoded_options[i].orig_option_with_args_text); > continue; These are good suggestions (I verbatim copied the warnings from code a few lines up). Will prepare a patch to fix all of them.
