https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ro at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Between 20160513 and 20160519, a new testsuite failure occured on Solaris/SPARC
(32- and 64-bit):

FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90   -O  (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)

/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:8:0:
internal compiler error: in bb_contains_loop_phi_nodes, at
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1078
0xf176f7 bb_contains_loop_phi_nodes
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1078
0xf1ed23
translate_isl_ast_to_gimple::copy_bb_and_scalar_dependences(basic_block_def*,
edge_def*, vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2730
0xf1f41f
translate_isl_ast_to_gimple::translate_isl_ast_node_user(isl_ast_node*,
edge_def*, std::map<isl_id*, tree_node*, std::less<isl_id*>,
std::allocator<std::pair<isl_id* const, tree_node*> > >&)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:936
0xf1fafb translate_isl_ast_to_gimple::translate_isl_ast_node_block(loop*,
isl_ast_node*, edge_def*, std::map<isl_id*, tree_node*, std::less<isl_id*>,
std::allocator<std::pair<isl_id* const, tree_node*> > >&)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:965
0xf2066f graphite_regenerate_ast_isl(scop*)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:3186
0xf16f03 graphite_transform_loops()
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite.c:329
0xf174cb graphite_transforms
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite.c:356
0xf174cb execute
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/graphite.c:433

This is a regression from gcc-6 and seems to be the same issue.

  Rainer

Reply via email to