https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > 3) We should think about whether we need to put out these +no extension > strings at all. I don't like that for my older systems I'll need to keep > updating my binutils to cover any new extension strings (e.g. +nolse) that > are added by GCC if I want to use -march=native . We shouldn't force that if > we don't have to. > Do you know why these +no where introduced in the first place? Why would there be a difference between "+nolse" and "" for instance?
