https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70240

--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Well, perhaps even better would be not to build all the trees, but use
> gimple_build () APIs that should also simplify stuff while building it on
> GIMPLE. But that might be too risky for stage4 now.

My previous statement might have been too bold: maybe you can pre-gimplify the
operands of the COND_EXPR without entirely undoing the fix for stage4.

Reply via email to