https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53637
TC <rs2740 at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from TC <rs2740 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Thomas Braun from comment #4)
> (I'm no gcc dev at all)
>
> In general gcc is much better in doing NRVO/URVO than other compilers
> according to my analysis [1]. So maybe the competitors need to get better
> first ;)
>
> [1]: http://www.byte-physics.de/cpp-copy-elision
The three cases (L, P, R) where GCC is "better" is actually non-conforming.
