https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69972
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #3)
> For C I'm thinking it should be straightforward to set/check TREE_NO_WARNING
> (I have an untested patch).
The duplicate warning shows that we are doing two times the same work. Wouldn't
it be better to avoid that?
> For the C++ testcase the problem is that the first one is a warning, while
> the second one is an error - we can't really omit that.
The C/C++ FEs share almost no code in this respect. It doesn't make sense to
keep both issues conflated. C++ bug is now PR70057.
