https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278 > > --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278 > > > > > > --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- > > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > > > > CCing Uros for the followup ICE. Apply > > > > > > Following patch should fix the ICE: > > > > > > --cut here-- > > > Index: config/i386/i386.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- config/i386/i386.c (revision 233864) > > > +++ config/i386/i386.c (working copy) > > > @@ -7794,6 +7794,10 @@ type_natural_mode (const_tree type, const CUMULATI > > > { > > > machine_mode innermode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (type)); > > > > > > + /* There are no XFmode vector modes. */ > > > + if (innermode == XFmode) > > > + return mode; > > > + > > > > Are there TFmode vector modes? Yes, insn-modes.h says so at least. > > No V1<float>modes there though, just V1<int>modes. > > Yes, vector TFmodes are present, and they work OK. > > > Will you test this or shall I? > > The patch was bootstrapped and regression tested, together with your patch. > So, > I'd say it is ready to be applied. Ok, I'll post/commit it with a testcase then. Richard.
