https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69993
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- There's an alternate suggestion here: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_6_wmisleadingindentation_vs_goto_fail/d0eqyih > This is just passive voice, there is nothing tricky about it. > What I find more confusing -- and what your fix preserves -- is the > reversed order of offending lines of code in the source file and the message. > > I'd rather go with something like this: > sslKeyExchange.c:629:4: warning: indentation of a statement below this 'if' > clause... [-Wmisleading-indentation] > if ((err = SSLHashSHA1.update(&hashCtx, &signedParams)) != 0) > ^~ > sslKeyExchange.c:631:8: note: ...suggests it is guarded by the 'if' clause, > but it's not > goto fail; > ^~~~ > You can even see how the indentation is wrong in the very error message. which suggests reversing the order of the messages, so that they appear in source order.
