https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Marc, in reply to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313#c10
I see there may be value in a -Weverything flag for debugging (and to check if
something already warns for a specific testcase). I believe it will be useless
for users, but, hey, I'm happy if the description warns users profusely about
it, so we don't get a tsunami of reports complaining that "it warns too much".
Your proposed patch (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313#c5) is
probably a good start. It probably doesn't maximize warnings that take several
levels (like Wstrict-overflow=) or warnings that internally have several levels
(like Wmain).
You should only need to convince Joseph or Dodji.
