https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|5.4 |7.0
Summary|[5/6 regression] |[5/6/7 regression]
|inconsistent warning |inconsistent warning
|maybe-uninitialized: warn |maybe-uninitialized: warn
|about 'unsigned', not warn |about 'unsigned', not warn
|about 'int' |about 'int'
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> So we can simplify the fix for PR13962 by only considering pointer with decl
> compares which points-to should handle well enough (and not fall into the
> issue
> of bogus ptr1 vs. ptr2 simplifications because we don't properly track
> whether
> ptr1 or ptr2 may be NULL). ISTR such checks also happen in libstdc++ code.
>
> Not sure if appropriate at this stage, I would tend to a no here. I'll queue
> re-visiting PR13962 during next stage1.
I agree it is too risky now. Let's retarget this at GCC 7 then.
