https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67314
Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> The trouble is that while gcc makes it easy to assign without a warning
> values to enums that are outside the range of the enumerated type, it makes
> it difficult to handle such values in case and switch statements without
> eliciting one of the -Wswitch warnings. In those cases gcc either complains
> about "case values being not in enumerated type" or it complains about a
> "switch missing default case" and there doesn't seem to be an easy way to
> make it happy.
See also Bug 61864 for more on issues with warnings having to do with the
relationship between enums and switch statements.
