https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #39 from Christopher Torres <redflames1003 at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #36) > Created attachment 36472 [details] > backported patch for the 4.9 branch > > Chris, > > retbnd is of no concern, nothing equivalent existed back then. > > call_stmt was called gimple_call. > > Here's a backported patch, barely tested. Please let me know how it goes > for you. Thank you. Looking at the diff it doesn't look like this will actually compile since redbnd and call_stmt is still in there. Did you maybe upload the wrong patch file? Thanks