https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986

--- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #13)
> A good principle in general is to assume cock-up, rather than
> conspiracy :-) The reason for this spreading between two functions is
> incremental development done at very different times. If you can see a
> way to rationalize the implementation, please do it.
> 
All right.  Well, as a first move, I will just commit the patch. :-)

Reply via email to