https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66788

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Not sure what is correct behavior here (Jakub points out mangling ignores
> the over-alignment).

Even ignoring the over-alignment, const cl_ulong& and cl_ulong& are different
types and I think it should be possible to overload on them.

Reply via email to