https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2015-07-03 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Marc Di Luzio from comment #3) > If this is still considered an issue, I would suggest that __carry be copy > constructed. No, it needs to be constructed empty, but with the same allocator: list __carry(get_allocator()); Unfortunately so does every element of the array __tmp: list __tmp[64] = { get_allocator(), get_allocator(), get_allocator(),...