https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66542

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1)
> This seems to be a regression versus gcc 4.8.2

That's why I changed the title to say [4.9/5/6 Regression] :-)

Reply via email to