https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205
--- Comment #6 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to char...@adacore.com from comment #5) > Certainly a very low quality workaround won't be accepted, this would cause > too much maintenance troubles. Sorry for the confusion. The patch I propose is the one attached to this PR; the VLQ workround is what I will have to do, not as part of GCC of course, if the patch is rejected. Note the workround would appear only in a restricted runtime, which would be like AdaCore’s restricted runtimes in that it wouldn’t be part of the official GCC tree, even though the copyright would be assigned to FSF.
