https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65913
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to yan12125 from comment #3) > Sorry, but I don't quite understand. Does that mean for all the future > versions (5.2, 6.0, etc.) -latomic flag is necessary if > atomic<T>::is_lock_free() is used in my program? >From my reading of the comments, the patch and current svn sources, the answer is "no". I'm guessing sooner or later the proposed patch will also be posted to the gcc-patches@ list and promptly reviewed and committed. Then hopefully back-ported in time for 5.2. But that's just a guess.