https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660

--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Performance seems to be back at Apr 2
Apr 2, 2015 16:20 UTC
    (Values: Base: 164.gzip: 1562, 175.vpr: 2384, 176.gcc: 2873, 181.mcf: 3743,
186.crafty: 2922, 197.parser: 2002, 252.eon: 4144, 255.vortex: 3345, 256.bzip2:
2221, 300.twolf: 3269 Peak: , 164.gzip: 1550, 175.vpr: 2402, 176.gcc: 2838,
181.mcf: 3810, 186.crafty: 2811, 197.parser: 1918, 252.eon: 4377, 255.vortex:
4353, 256.bzip2: 2334, 300.twolf: 3225)
Apr 2, 2015 07:20 UTC
    (Values: Base: 164.gzip: 1573, 175.vpr: 2144, 176.gcc: 2798, 181.mcf: 3739,
186.crafty: 2906, 197.parser: 1990, 252.eon: 3795, 255.vortex: 3100, 256.bzip2:
2214, 300.twolf: 3252 Peak: , 164.gzip: 1554, 175.vpr: 2402, 176.gcc: 2825,
181.mcf: 3794, 186.crafty: 2804, 197.parser: 1915, 252.eon: 4339, 255.vortex:
4350, 256.bzip2: 2344, 300.twolf: 3264)

Not sure what changed in that range

Reply via email to