[Bug bootstrap/65522] [5 Regression] Svn revision 221590 fails bootstrap - ../libiberty/libiberty.a(cplus-dem.o): In function `ada_demangle': cplus-dem.c:(.text+0xdb8): multiple definition of `ada_demangle' ada/adadecode.o:adadecode.c:(.text+0x863): first defined here

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |charlet at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org           |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, except ada_demangle is also exported from libgnat*.so - wonder why the RTS
is built with IN_GCC.
In that case, guess the Ada folks need to decide which one of the two to keep,
and/or if one of them (either adadecode.[ch], or {include,libiberty}/* one
shouldn't be renamed to something else.
I haven't found any uses of either of those, except the libiberty demangler
that calls ada_demangle but it could very well call a static routine instead.