https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> --- Created attachment 34955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34955&action=edit Proposed Fix Well, I noticed that the first version of this patch caused a small but measurable decrease of code quality on x86_64, so I moved the patch to the if (strict_volatile_bitfield_p block, and used some code transformations to simplify the resulting code a bit. I will post this new version for review, after a full boot-strap and successful regression-test on my ARM target.
