https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65261

--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Markus, yes, if adding that attribute clears up the messages for you, then I
would agree with that solution.  The code is working as designed, as use of
unaligned vector loads and stores on POWER8 is preferable to the
forced-alignment solution.  Could you please verify and submit a patch?

Thanks,
Bill

Reply via email to