https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #15 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #14) > FWIW, LGTM (with suitable guards added to the tests for the target alias > support). > (I cannot officially approve of course ;) ) > ... if we find other regressions a new PR can be opened. Does this even need approval from a Darwin maintainer (as it doesn't seem to touch darwin-specific files at all)?
