https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65131
--- Comment #5 from Francois Fayard <fayard at insideloop dot io> --- They are so many people out there who claim that using an unsigned integer (std::size_t) as an array index was a good choice because you can allocate larger arrays than with the signed integer of the same size (std::ptrdiff_t) that it would be nice to show them they can't :-) max_size() is not clearly defined, but I still think it would be nice to put it in max_size() as a "documentation".
