https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-02-07, at 10:49 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > 4) if there has been any change on the compiler side, can you bisect when did > that happen? >From test logs: r214122 was okay and r214400 failed. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net