https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247

--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-02-07, at 10:49 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> 4) if there has been any change on the compiler side, can you bisect when did
> that happen?

>From test logs:
r214122 was okay and r214400 failed.

Dave
--
John David Anglin    dave.ang...@bell.net

Reply via email to