https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511

--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
-O3 -g testcase from PR64817 showing probably the same issue as #c0 with
reorder_operands reverted:

int a, b, d;

void
foo (void)
{
  for (b = 0; b < 9; b++)
    {
      int e;
      for (d = 0; d < 5; d++)
{
  a &= 231;
  a ^= 14;
}
      a ^= 1;
      e = (a < 0) + a;
    }
}

Reply via email to