https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504
--- Comment #14 from ccoutant at google dot com --- > But then there is (question mainly on Cary) the .debug_types checksumming: > > case dw_val_class_const_double: > CHECKSUM_ULEB128 (DW_FORM_block); > CHECKSUM_ULEB128 (sizeof (at->dw_attr_val.v.val_double)); > CHECKSUM (at->dw_attr_val.v.val_double); > break; > > case dw_val_class_wide_int: > CHECKSUM_ULEB128 (DW_FORM_block); > CHECKSUM_ULEB128 (sizeof (*at->dw_attr_val.v.val_wide)); > CHECKSUM (*at->dw_attr_val.v.val_wide); > break; > > and that one ought to be governed by the DWARF standard, so I wonder how it > can > get away without converting for endianity etc. There shouldn't be any location lists in .debug_types, so I don't think the DWARF standard really matters for this case, and it would be reasonable to use the same hashing you use for other purposes. Some may slip through, unfortunately, so I covered this case just for completeness. -cary
